Jump to content


Photo

VERY unusual Waterman lever-filler


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 05 April 2013 - 12:36 AM

OK, this is a bit of a tease.

Posted Image

Whaddya think? Anyone have another?

#2 George

George

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 256 posts

Posted 05 April 2013 - 12:45 AM

I'm still waiting for the safety version...

David, what does the lever and the fingernail cutout look like? If I remember correctly, these have the notched cutout under the globe, and not the more circular types found on "earlier" lever fillers.

Regards,
George

#3 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:20 AM

The lever is typical of the early PSF pens with the 2-part sprung pressure bar, but postdating the very earliest pens without the notch under the lever end.
Did I never tell you about the so-called safeties?
Guess that's for another post (hint: they aren't really safeties) . . . .

David

#4 Procyon

Procyon

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 725 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 05 April 2013 - 02:25 AM

David,

I believe that would be a slip-cap pen rather than a PSF, which would be a screw-on cap. It is not seen very often.

Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar.  And doesn't.

 

 

Regards,
Allan


#5 George

George

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 256 posts

Posted 05 April 2013 - 02:36 AM

David,

I believe that would be a slip-cap pen rather than a PSF, which would be a screw-on cap. It is not seen very often.


I think the phrase 'not seen very often' might be an understatement in this case!

Regards,
George




#6 Procyon

Procyon

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 725 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 05 April 2013 - 04:18 AM


David,

I believe that would be a slip-cap pen rather than a PSF, which would be a screw-on cap. It is not seen very often.


I think the phrase 'not seen very often' might be an understatement in this case!

Regards,
George




Well, since I have been chastised a few times, on other boards, for using the term "rare", I hesitate to use it. Sort of like a whipped dog. Whimper ... whimper ...whimper.... :rolleyes:

Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar.  And doesn't.

 

 

Regards,
Allan


#7 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 05 April 2013 - 01:11 PM

Posted Image

I don't think anyone has to apologize for applying the "r" word to this!

As a side note, how many other slip-cap lever-fillers have you seen? De La Rue made them. Can't think of any others, offhand.

Edited by David Nishimura, 05 April 2013 - 01:12 PM.


#8 david i

david i

    ADVISOR

  • ADVISORS
  • 7,515 posts
  • LocationEast Coast USA

Posted 05 April 2013 - 03:55 PM

Posted Image

I don't think anyone has to apologize for applying the "r" word to this!

As a side note, how many other slip-cap lever-fillers have you seen? De La Rue made them. Can't think of any others, offhand.


Certainly fair. I've handled... many... Watermans, though this era/make is not in my couple core foci. Still, don't think I've ever seen a lever-fill cone-cap Waterman before. Nice to see...

regards

david
David R. Isaacson MD. Website: VACUMANIA.com for quality old pens with full warranty.
Email: isaacson@frontiernet.net

Posted Image

#9 kimsdad

kimsdad

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 71 posts

Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:38 AM

Would Conklins count?

#10 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 17 April 2013 - 01:08 AM

Crescent-fillers, no -- we're talking slip-cap lever-fillers.

Earlier self-fillers did routinely come in slip-cap configuration, but not lever-fillers.

#11 Jerry Adair

Jerry Adair

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 305 posts
  • LocationShorewood

Posted 17 April 2013 - 08:47 PM

David
How about a slip cap button filler? Do they count? I gots one of them.
Jerry

#12 david i

david i

    ADVISOR

  • ADVISORS
  • 7,515 posts
  • LocationEast Coast USA

Posted 17 April 2013 - 09:24 PM

David
How about a slip cap button filler? Do they count? I gots one of them.
Jerry


But not a Waterman... ;)

-d
David R. Isaacson MD. Website: VACUMANIA.com for quality old pens with full warranty.
Email: isaacson@frontiernet.net

Posted Image

#13 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 17 April 2013 - 11:28 PM

The interesting thing here is that we have two design features (screw-caps and levers) that were adopted very quickly and in close succession. So it's exceptional to find a non-screw-cap lever-filler, of any brand.

This doesn't apply to some other filling systems that hit the market earlier. That's why slip-cap crescent-fillers aren't rare; ditto for slip-cap twist-fillers.

Button-fillers appeared later, but still a bit before lever-fillers arrived in force. So while slip-cap button-fillers are uncommon (and undervalued, in my opinion), they aren't truly rare.

#14 Jerry Adair

Jerry Adair

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 305 posts
  • LocationShorewood

Posted 18 April 2013 - 01:52 AM

David


My Parker is obviously pre Duofold and I seem to recall a date of around 1916 for the button filler from Parker. Didn't Waterman introduce the lever filler around the same time. ca 1915/1916?

Jerry

#15 david i

david i

    ADVISOR

  • ADVISORS
  • 7,515 posts
  • LocationEast Coast USA

Posted 18 April 2013 - 04:33 AM

David


My Parker is obviously pre Duofold and I seem to recall a date of around 1916 for the button filler from Parker. Didn't Waterman introduce the lever filler around the same time. ca 1915/1916?

Jerry


Hi Jerry,

We might be talking different issues.

You had written...

David
How about a slip cap button filler? Do they count? I gots one of them.
Jerry



My response of "not a Waterman ;) " referenced that while there are slip cap button filling pens out there, I believe none ever appeared under the Waterman label, cited because the early posts about the thread were describing the scarce finding of a Waterman lever-fill slip cap. Indeed, barring a funky non-USA button-filling 1940's-ish celluloid Waterman, I don't know of any vintage button-fill Watermans.

If there is a button fill slip cap Waterman, I'm happy to hear of it.

As for other pens, Parker did, iirc, make slip cap button-fill pens.

best regards

david
David R. Isaacson MD. Website: VACUMANIA.com for quality old pens with full warranty.
Email: isaacson@frontiernet.net

Posted Image

#16 Jerry Adair

Jerry Adair

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 305 posts
  • LocationShorewood

Posted 18 April 2013 - 05:38 PM

Sorry for the confusion mine is indeed a Parker. I did not intend to intimate that Waterman made a button filler I was only have a little fun because Kims Dad said Conklin when the thread was clearly Waterman
Jerry

#17 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:02 PM

My Parker is obviously pre Duofold and I seem to recall a date of around 1916 for the button filler from Parker. Didn't Waterman introduce the lever filler around the same time. ca 1915/1916?


I don't have the exact dates for Parker to hand at the moment, but I can tell you that Waterman appears to have introduced their lever-filler in spring of 1915, and that Parker had had their button-filler on the market for a few years prior to that.

#18 Jerry Adair

Jerry Adair

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 305 posts
  • LocationShorewood

Posted 19 April 2013 - 05:22 PM

My Parker is obviously pre Duofold and I seem to recall a date of around 1916 for the button filler from Parker. Didn't Waterman introduce the lever filler around the same time. ca 1915/1916?


I don't have the exact dates for Parker to hand at the moment, but I can tell you that Waterman appears to have introduced their lever-filler in spring of 1915, and that Parker had had their button-filler on the market for a few years prior to that.


David
I did some research when I found the pen as I had never seen a slip cap button filler. Apparently Parker bought the rights to a button filler around 1913 and introduced that design whilst working on an improvement which he patented in 1915 John Davison was listed as the inventor. So it appears that the 2 filling systems arrived on the scene at nearly the same time. So according to what I have learned you are 100% right that the Parker buttonfiller predated the lever filler by about 2 years. My pen also has an unusual nib (at least to me) there is a round hole in the center and it looks somewhat hand engraved.
Jerry

#19 Roger W.

Roger W.

    ADVISOR

  • Moderators
  • 944 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 19 April 2013 - 07:41 PM

David N.

Is your context two inventions used in quick succession by Waterman? Otherwise the screw cap predates the lever by at least eight years (considering Sheaffer didn't manu. until 1912 though patent 1908) - or in this context eight years is quick?

Roger W.

#20 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 20 April 2013 - 07:45 PM

Screw-cap pens were offered at a very early date, but what we are discussing here is when screw-caps displaced slip-caps -- both in the industry as a whole, and within individual penmakers' offerings. And I think you'll find that the general pattern is that screw-caps did become the default design shortly before levers were adopted. Older slip-cap designs often remained in the lineup for years thereafter, but any new models came out in screw-cap form.

Incidentally, though no examples have been found to date, Sheaffer did apparently make some slip-cap lever-fillers in their first run of single-bar pens.

The real turning point appears to have been around 1912-1914. Note also that Conklin made the switch across their entire line at this very time, discontinuing all slip-cap models.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users