Jump to content


Photo

Early Waterman Eyedroppers


  • Please log in to reply
68 replies to this topic

#61 BrianMcQueen

BrianMcQueen

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 1,017 posts
  • LocationLynchburg, VA

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:55 PM



Not trying to sound stubborn, nieve, or ignorant, but I think I have pretty good English given my age. I do need to work on some things, learning more complex words (you guys help me out on that), making sure my sentences make grammatical sense, and making sure I don't confuse "their" with "there" which I believe is a common problem. I will work on the last one especially, as it seems to be the biggest problem.

Just to put it out there, I did score in the 99th percentile on the essay writing portion of the ACT.

Regarding the recession of 2009, I understand the devastation that many went through. Some of the biggest banks went into bankruptcy, car company's which America was once dependent on were hit hard and some filed for Chapter 11, and many homeowners and small businesses had to close just to put food on the table.

Regarding the last comment, the answer is easily no. And you read my life pretty good I must say :)


Seems like you also need to learn how to spell "naive" (not nieve), learn when to use "good" and "well" and learn how to pluralize the word "company" (hint, it's "companies" not "company's")

You most certainly do not have good English given your age. My 17 year old sister would laugh at your abysmal English. You don't need to learn more complex words. You need to learn how to use the ones you already know. Exercising sesquipedalian loquaciousness often contributes to confusion, and will look downright silly if used with otherwise poor grammar. Even worse is when you use a big word incorrectly. Read the following sentences and let me know which sounds better.

1. I trusted there erudition rather then execute independent research. If only I had preceding cognizance that they're information was incongruous, I could have done pretty good.

2. I took their word for it instead of researching the subject myself. If only I had known that they gave me bad advice, I could have done well.

Bonus points if you can point out the grammatical mistakes in the first pair of sentences.


1. Really bad, too many big words, don't even understand the sentence.

2. Sounds best.


You got it. Well, almost. You should check out this article on comparative versus superlative adjectives. What you mean to say is that number 2 sounds better.

Let's remove the fancy words from number 1. Can you then identify the grammatical errors?

I trusted there knowledge rather then conducting my own research. If only I had knew that they're information was bad, I could of done pretty good.

#62 BrianMcQueen

BrianMcQueen

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 1,017 posts
  • LocationLynchburg, VA

Posted 15 May 2013 - 10:59 PM



No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Is this "No" in response to his answer to my English question, or is it in response to his original post about the numbering system?




Sorry for the confusion, it was in response to his answer to your English question. The multiquotes become tedious in my opinion, but understand they help with continuity; so it was a personal choice to omit them in my previous post.


Unfortunately, I'm going to have to agree with Brandon on this one. The first example is pure junk. It is full of bad grammar and misuse of big words. The point I was trying to make is that million dollar words do not make a million dollar man. Putting fancy words in a fundamentally bad sentence is like putting a new paint job on a wrecked car.

#63 sloegin

sloegin

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 285 posts

Posted 15 May 2013 - 11:08 PM




No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Is this "No" in response to his answer to my English question, or is it in response to his original post about the numbering system?




Sorry for the confusion, it was in response to his answer to your English question. The multiquotes become tedious in my opinion, but understand they help with continuity; so it was a personal choice to omit them in my previous post.


Unfortunately, I'm going to have to agree with Brandon on this one. The first example is pure junk. It is full of bad grammar and misuse of big words. The point I was trying to make is that million dollar words do not make a million dollar man. Putting fancy words in a fundamentally bad sentence is like putting a new paint job on a wrecked car.


I'm not disagreeing with you or Brandon on which sentence is better. The sentences convey a nearly identical sentiment regardless of the vocabulary or grammar. I think the difference between being concise and verbose when one doesn't recognize the possessive tense is moot.

#64 brando090

brando090

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 719 posts

Posted 16 May 2013 - 01:53 AM

No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Im more of a visual learner. Along with that, I'm also an auditory and logical thinker.

#65 david i

david i

    ADVISOR

  • ADVISORS
  • 7,515 posts
  • LocationEast Coast USA

Posted 16 May 2013 - 02:24 AM


No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Im more of a visual learner. Along with that, I'm also an auditory and logical thinker.


Define "auditory thinker"

regards

david
David R. Isaacson MD. Website: VACUMANIA.com for quality old pens with full warranty.
Email: isaacson@frontiernet.net

Posted Image

#66 Procyon

Procyon

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 725 posts
  • LocationSouthern California

Posted 16 May 2013 - 02:38 AM

Im more of a visual learner. Along with that, I'm also an auditory and logical thinker.



Well, that should cover most of the bases.

Edited by Procyon, 16 May 2013 - 02:40 AM.


Schrödinger's cat walks into a bar.  And doesn't.

 

 

Regards,
Allan


#67 FarmBoy

FarmBoy

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 676 posts
  • LocationSFO USA

Posted 16 May 2013 - 03:27 AM



No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Im more of a visual learner. Along with that, I'm also an auditory and logical thinker.


Define "auditory thinker"

regards

david

I'm all ears on this one.

For fun, Brandon can you identify the literary technique used in my reply to David? Note the SAT manual identifies 25 so it should be easy.

#68 brando090

brando090

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 719 posts

Posted 16 May 2013 - 03:43 AM



No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Im more of a visual learner. Along with that, I'm also an auditory and logical thinker.


Define "auditory thinker"

regards

david


Someone who learns best from hearing information that is presented audibly.

#69 brando090

brando090

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 719 posts

Posted 16 May 2013 - 03:46 AM




No.

Are you aware of how you personally learn things? Tell us, because everything seems to be beyond your grasp and people are trying to help.


Im more of a visual learner. Along with that, I'm also an auditory and logical thinker.


Define "auditory thinker"

regards

david

I'm all ears on this one.

For fun, Brandon can you identify the literary technique used in my reply to David? Note the SAT manual identifies 25 so it should be easy.


I have no idea..




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users