Jump to content


Photo

Pen Review - Boston 43


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Roger W.

Roger W.

    ADVISOR

  • Moderators
  • 944 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 03 March 2014 - 12:03 AM

Pen Review – Boston 43

 

There seems to be some conventions on doing these reviews elsewhere so I plan on closely following the work done of my predecessors.  To say pen reviews are worthwhile is to underline the “R” in Review! 

 

Appearance and Design:

It appears to be a pen or at least that seems to be how it is designed.  I give it 10 skrip bottles out of 11 (because 11 is one more than 10 – and if you don’t get the reference I’m not going to help you). 

 

Construction and Quality:

It is a hard rubber pen from the early teens.  A skilled chappy is what turned this pen a 100 years ago I can surely relate!  Boston quality is legendary so I give it 11 skrip bottles out of 11.

 

Weight:

Surprisingly it weighs much less than my car.  I’m shocked that something so light weight can hold ink.  The weight from the hump filler (discussed next) makes it weighty for its class so 8 skrips out of 11.  Compared to the chrome on a car it is necessary.

 

Filling System:

This is not one of those crap piston fillers but, an honest to goodness hump filler.  If it was good enough for Conklin it should be good enough for Boston.  Unfortunately with the big metal hump relying on the sac resilience your sac life will be limited to probably a couple of years top.  Gots to give it 5 skrips out of 11.

 

Nib:

The nib is 220 mm long which is maybe 14mm longer than a traditional Sheaffer nib in the 1940’s – now that is a lot of firepower!  I’m not saying you could have a jet take off from that distance but, it’d be pretty close!  It has a degree of flex that could be compared to the hands of a clock – they both move.  Easily this one gets 9 skrips out of 11.

 

Costs/Value:

It can be expensive as I’ve seen versions of Boston hump fillers over $500.  This one is a short black pen (I hear black pen society - just saying) with a roller clip so expect to pay $150+ which is a little pricey for a vintage pen so 7 skrips out of 11.

 

Overall

I’m so damned psyched to have this pen inked up!  I give it an overall 9.2 skrip bottles out of 11 or 9 bottles and a couple of cartridges.  I can’t understand why everyone doesn’t just run out and buy one today.  Now I can write like obsidian.



#2 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 01:21 AM

Will a Safari nib fit?



#3 Roger W.

Roger W.

    ADVISOR

  • Moderators
  • 944 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 03 March 2014 - 12:31 PM

David;

 

I can appreciate your inquiry and will ask the guy I bought my eye dropper conversion kit from.  One question that maybe you can help me with - do I need both the O-rings and the plumbers tape or just one of them with some silicon grease?

 

Roger W.



#4 David Nishimura

David Nishimura

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 701 posts

Posted 03 March 2014 - 10:36 PM

I think we should ask Todd about that.

 

David



#5 catalyst

catalyst

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 04 March 2014 - 02:47 AM

you didn't mention whether you can write with it posted or is it overbalanced?



#6 Rocco P

Rocco P

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 208 posts
  • LocationItaly, Rome

Posted 04 March 2014 - 05:08 AM

Anyway, since there are no photos, we must assume that, actually, nothing ever happened.

--

Rocco


#7 Roger W.

Roger W.

    ADVISOR

  • Moderators
  • 944 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 04 March 2014 - 06:27 AM

I can assure you that significant stuff went down and here are the pictures to prove it.

 

Boston43.jpg

Boston 43 Hump filler roller ball clip

 

Boston43a.jpg

Look at that long Boston 3 nib!

 

Boston43b.jpg

Stamped 43 - no scrimping with a 43s - (would have a 2 nib)

 

Boston43c.jpg

Boston Safety Fountain Pen - sideview of the hump

 

Boston43d.jpg

Posted

 

You could carefully post is but, as a flattop it could never be balanced (excellent question!)

 

It is as stated a Boston 43 hump filler roller clip with a very flexible #3 nib.  It had been resacced so I did ink it up.

 

Roger W.



#8 FarmBoy

FarmBoy

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 676 posts
  • LocationSFO USA

Posted 05 March 2014 - 05:59 AM

I think we should ask Todd about that.
 
David

After an hour in the shop I can adapt this to be a cartridge/converter. But you will need to supply the converter.

#9 Roger W.

Roger W.

    ADVISOR

  • Moderators
  • 944 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 05 March 2014 - 06:42 AM

Don't be telling me I can't make this an eyedropper because that is what I am hell bent all about.  If I wanted a converter I would have bought an eye dropper in the first place.  Face it the designed filling system is just incidental to the users desires.  Pens were meant to be used and not only used but modified.  Ink sacs are soo last century.

 

Roger W.



#10 Rocco P

Rocco P

    journeyman

  • Members
  • 208 posts
  • LocationItaly, Rome

Posted 05 March 2014 - 07:22 AM

Maybe you could use a converter from some of those great Chinese pens, you know, those that use a sac instead of a piston. Pistons are so passé..
Better yet, it would be cool if you found a way to use the converter from the outside of the pen, like, some way to press the sac...

Edited by Paolino, 05 March 2014 - 07:22 AM.

--

Rocco





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users